[Feedback Request] Automated Construction API Testing Improvements
Before beginning work on Construction API testing improvements, we wanted to gather feedback from the community on our proposed approach (attached below). We spent a lot of time thinking through...
View Article[Feedback Request] Automated Construction API Testing Improvements
Thank you @patrick.ogrady. From the perspective of a human test author, I wonder about the feasibility of using a more friendly format than JSON. JSON is great for machines, but not ideal for a human....
View Article[Feedback Request] Automated Construction API Testing Improvements
Let me start by saying that we haven’t spent much time on our construction API implementation yet (though this will change this week), so take my feedback with a grain of salt. Overall, I like the...
View Article[Feedback Request] Automated Construction API Testing Improvements
bkase: I think a DSL would be best, but the nice thing about using JSON is you let the implementor build whatever DSL they want that can compile to the required JSON. I think this is a great callout,...
View Article[Feedback Request] Automated Construction API Testing Improvements
I believe the improved Construction API could help automatically check most of the transaction types. But I suggest the Construction API only focus on some specific test fields, including multi-asset...
View Article[Feedback Request] Automated Construction API Testing Improvements
We have also just started working on this endpoints. I do agree with cipherw: So my suggestion is to focus on the token balance, transfer, deposit/withdraw (POs), multi asset operations. It will cover...
View Article[Feedback Request] Automated Construction API Testing Improvements
In our organization, we’re interested in using the automated test in our CI tests. For that, we desire a way to run it for a finite amount of time. Read full topic
View Article[Feedback Request] Automated Construction API Testing Improvements
oasis-w: In our organization, we’re interested in using the automated test in our CI tests. For that, we desire a way to run it for a finite amount of time. We just merged a PR into the rosetta-cli...
View Article[Feedback Request] Automated Construction API Testing Improvements
cipherw: So my suggestion is to focus on the token balance, transfer, deposit/withdraw (POs), multi asset operations. It will cover 90% or more user scenarios, and leave the other tests to a case by...
View Article[Feedback Request] Automated Construction API Testing Improvements
alan.verbner: One thing that we are facing, not sure if others do as well, is that sometimes when creating a transaction, custom things or values need to be defined or set. For example, we need to...
View Article[Feedback Request] Automated Construction API Testing Improvements
Do you feel you could automate all supported transaction types with this proposed solution? Are there any primitives missing? We wanted to highlight the following transaction primitives that Kadena...
View Article[Feedback Request] Automated Construction API Testing Improvements
Thanks for chiming in @linda! Getting some perspective from a sharded blockchain is great! linda: (A) We’re a sharded blockchain so the ability to test different types of transactions across different...
View Article[Feedback Request] Automated Construction API Testing Improvements
Thanks for providing all this detail about your use case. Helps a lot when thinking about improvements here. I have a specific follow-up question…is it possible to query the unclaimed balance for an...
View Article[Feedback Request] Automated Construction API Testing Improvements
linda: How important is this? Our first reaction is that this should be handled externally by tracking all cross-chain transfers, setting them as initially unfinished and then marking them as finished...
View Article[Feedback Request] Automated Construction API Testing Improvements
Was a solution considered for mapping custom metadata from /construction/metadata to /construction/preprocess in the rosetta-cli check scenarios @patrick.ogrady? Rosetta-cli check construction +...
View Article